Presiding City Council to Decide Operating Rules for the Next City Council
Will any member of the City Council be allowed to place an item on the City Council meeting agenda or will the 2019 policy prohibiting this freedom stay in effect?
Agenda Item 6.5: Mayor-Elect Farrah Khan and Councilmember Anthony Kuo have placed a last-minute item on this Tuesday’s packed Special Council Meeting agenda. They are asking the Council to approve a motion to make the 2019 City Council Policy/Procedure regarding City Council-initiated agenda items, that requires a written memorandum signed by either at least two members of the City Council or the Mayor, permanent.
The 2019 change was approved despite a dozen residents who spoke in opposition. The item was first brought forward at the request of Mayor Christina Shea and Councilmember Mike Carroll, and approved by Councilmembers Farrah Khan and Anthony Kuo. Councilmember Melissa Fox was absent.
Below is the Memo placing this item on the agenda for Tuesday’s meeting.
This policy requirement has the potential of having an adverse impact on Irvine’s decision making process by:
- Giving the mayor unequal power in deciding which issues of city and community concern will be addressed by the City Council and the Great Park Board of Directors.
- Stifles a councilmember’s ability to place items on meeting agendas that they believe to be of interest or concern to the city and/or to members of the public with whom they have been communicating.
- The policy has the potential of creating violations of the Brown Act which requires discussion of city business matters between the majority of the City Council (3 members for Irvine) to be in a public forum. Should a councilmember consult with more than one other councilmember regarding a request to place an item on the meeting agenda, they would be in violation of the Brown Act.
Councilmembers’ Power & Authority Must Be of Equal Weight
In the interest of preserving Irvine’s democratic process, Councilmembers’ power and authority must be of equal weight with regards to both their vote and to their ability to place items on meeting agendas. The interest of having a balanced City Council and ensuring equal rights to representation far outweighs that of creating shorter business meetings and shorter meeting agendas.
A new Council is scheduled to be sworn in on December 8, 2020. Councilmembers wishing to place items on council agendas will have to adhere to the policy that will be decided on this Tuesday. Two of the five current councilmembers will not be returning.
Here is the e-Comment link for this agenda item 6.5.
Meeting Info & Links
Special City Council Meeting
November 24, 2020 at 2:30PM
Agenda Item 6.5
Click to submit an e-Comment
Click to watch the meeting LiveStream
2 Comments
Susan Sayre
November 23, 2020 at 11:05 amSadly, I, along with other Irvine community members, am surprised and greatly disheartened that Council Member Khan has chosen to propose the continuation of this policy which serves to stifle Irvine’s Democratic process. This policy is inconsistent with Council Member Khan’s past promotion of transparency and inclusion in Irvine’s decision making process as this policy potentially serves to shut out the voices of the people who voted for, and communicate with, council members. ALL IRVINE RESIDENTS have the right to have their issues and concerns addressed in Irvine business meetings.
magaido
November 23, 2020 at 3:18 pmThis misguided current policy denying certain individual elected councilmembers the right to place items of concern for discussion by all councilmembers and the public should be allowed to sunset.
Comments are closed.