Irvine Residents Exert Influence on Proposed Irvine Company Housing Development Near Asphalt Plant
On October 21, 2021, the Irvine City Planning Commission voted 3-2 to postpone making a decision on the Irvine Company’s tract map and master plan proposal for Neighborhood Four of Orchard Hills, a neighborhood situated a half-mile away from an asphalt plant.
In what normally takes place with little fanfare at planning commission meetings, Irvine City Hall auditorium was packed with an assortment of Irvine residents, including high school students, local politicians, scientists, and lawyers. Most attendees came to protest the Irvine Company’s efforts to build 520 multi-million dollar single-family homes approximately a half-mile away from the All American Asphalt (AAA) plant – a plant alleged to emit high levels of toxins and odors into the air. Plans for the new neighborhood also include two private parks and a daycare site.
High turnout at this meeting was a clear sign of growing unrest among North Irvine residents who have reported foul and pervasive odors and smoke rising from the plant for years. The plant was originally built in 1993, far from existing homes, on land then belonging to the County of Orange. In the early 2000s, the city incorporated that land and the City of Irvine inherited AAA land-use permits to operate in the manner that it does today.
In 2005, the city approved construction of the Orchard Hills community, with minimal disclosures about AAA to future Orchard Hills homebuyers. Commissioner Mary Ann Gaido, at the conclusion of the October 21, 2021 meeting, admitted that in 2005, when she was Chair of the Planning Commission, nobody on the commission had much information about AAA prior to approving plans for Orchard Hills. However, since September 2019, residents have filed nearly 1,000 complaints with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) about odors and emissions from the plant. AQMD and the city of Irvine conducted their own testing programs concluding that emissions are not hazardous. However, an independent review by researchers at UCI questioned the testing methodology used by AQMD and the city of Irvine, and concluded that the existence of potentially dangerous levels of chemicals in the air near the community could not be ruled out.
Public comments at the meeting were largely unified in asking the city to move or close AAA, prevent further developments near the plant, and provide further and more comprehensive air quality testing. Residents came out to share personal stories and described an odor so foul, they alter their outdoor lifestyle. Other residents spoke about black soot buildup near their doors and windows that they suspect were linked to asphalt emissions.
After more than three hours of public comments, the commissioners deliberated for an hour on hypotheticals, legal scenarios, and scientific studies. Jeff Davis, the Irvine Company representative, said that the housing plan met all requirements for approval, referencing an AQMD report concluding that toxic emissions do not reach dangerous levels, and claimed it was fundamentally unfair to penalize a property development for the possible wrongdoings and nuisances of a third party outside the development area. The commission collectively expressed frustration over AAA’s presence but noted the legal difficulty in forcing a private company to move when that company has met its land use obligations.
Planning Commission Vice Chair Stephen Huang, appointed by Mayor Farrah Khan, opened discussions with no mention of health and safety concerns. His line of inquiry centered on contractual obligations between the City and the Irvine Company. Chair Jeff Pierson, appointed by Councilman Michael Carroll, expressed similar concerns, but made note of one more pending AQMD air quality study that he would like to know the results of.
Commissioner Jong Limb, appointed by Councilwoman Tammy Kim, led discussions in favor of resident concerns over pollution from AAA, followed by support from Commissioner Gaido, appointed by Councilman Larry Agran. Limb expressed profound concern over the conflicting scientific studies on the air toxicity issue and called for more studies before moving forward with any decisions. Limb sought an indefinite halt to the new housing project but was not supported by his colleagues, who feared legal retaliation by the Irvine Company. Ultimately, the commission voted in favor of continuing discussions about the tract map and master plan approval through November 4, 2021.
Commissioners Jong Limb (Kim), Mary Ann Gaido (Agran), and Christine Knowland (Kuo) voted for the continuance, with Steve Huang (Khan) and Jeff Pierson (Carroll) voting to approve the Irvine Company’s petition.
The robust display of civic engagement by concerned North Irvine residents achieved a small win in preventing the Irvine Company from receiving approval to move the development project forward. However, once discussions resume on November 4, the petition may still be approved.
For information on the Planning Commission and for agendas, minutes, and information on how to participate click here.
If you’d like to reach out to any of the Planning Commissioners before the next meeting, you can email them here:
Mary Ann Gaido, appointed by Larry Agran – [email protected]
Steve Huang, appointed by Farrah Khan – [email protected]
Christine Knowland, appointed by Anthony Kuo – [email protected]
Jong Limb, appointed by Tammy Kim – [email protected]
Jeff Pierson, appointed by Michael Carroll – [email protected]
Branda LinOctober 22, 2021 at 2:41 pm
We need to start televising Planning Commission meetings. These decisions are much too important to not be given full transparency. So many people listening in didn’t know who was speaking when. Please, for the sake of transparency, televise the PC meetings like we do our City Council and Great Park Board meetings. We have the technology and the set up for it and it would help foster more engagement from the community.
WoofyOctober 22, 2021 at 2:45 pm
Commissioners listened to local residents much like coumcilmembers did regarding the cemetery. Great step! The Irvine Co. should be more involved with a solution.
Richard GreenOctober 22, 2021 at 3:24 pm
Hello “Woofy” – Be advised that for full transparency and accountability we now require all users posting comments to do so using their real names. This will be actively enforced.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Doug ElliottOctober 22, 2021 at 3:16 pm
Excellent article, Jeremy Ficarola! I must say that I’m getting very tired of this false narrative being spun by spineless politicians who lack the will to do their jobs: “The commission collectively expressed frustration over AAA’s presence but noted the legal difficulty in forcing a private company to move when that company has met its land use obligations.”
Why the assumption that force is necessary? There is a thing called negotiation that’s known to happen in the legal and business worlds. It seems to me that if presented with a reasonable offer, AAA might well entertain the possibility of selling the site and moving out. If not, Irvine has this other thing called eminent domain powers. These are avenues that need to be explored.
David LingerfeltOctober 23, 2021 at 7:27 am
@Doug, I heard Dave Min said this was a $2 or $3 million problem. A commossiomer said $25 million. I heard AAA produced revenues of $160 million from that plant which makes me think it’s much closer to what the commissioner said. I encouraged the resident organization to focus on 2 things: 1. the air sampling 2. the just compensation to AAA.
ParisMOctober 23, 2021 at 11:18 am
I am surprised that the Irvine Company would even proceed with a development that has a toxic air problem near it. It would seem that their reputation (Irvine Co.) could be tarnished by moving forward with this project. But when it comes to money, I guess the Irvine Co is more concerned about their bottom line than an Irvine resident living near toxic air and having to breath it. Is this the legacy the Irvine Co wants to be remembered for?
GregCostiganOctober 23, 2021 at 1:44 pm
I’ve posted about this before. I’m open to discussions. But we have a housing deficit of hundreds of thousands of home state wide.
CA – housing shortage. LA metro – housing shortage. OC- housing shortage. It’s everywhere.
We can nit pick here and there about individual developments, or we can collectively come together and work on solutions.
We need more homes for people, so lets be part of the solution.
Luis4IrvineOctober 24, 2021 at 2:48 am
[Open Letter to IRVINE PLANNING COMMISSION]
Dear Planning Commissioners Huang and Pierson,
For the reasons outlined multiple times by the independent fact-checking group Irvine Watchdog and various articles and public comments, I urge you all to reconsider your VOTE to for “Irvine Company’s tract map and master plan proposal for Neighborhood Four of Orchard Hills, a neighborhood situated a half-mile away from an asphalt plant.” (According to the staff report, there are currently 3,439 units entitled or constructed within the planning area. With the additional 520 future dwelling units under consideration, the total residential development in PA 1 would be 3,959 units, which is within the dwelling unit cap.
The Irvine Company should not be putting up homes near a plant that throws off toxic pollutants. People’s lives are at stake. This is SO WRONG. Irvine families’ health and safety must COME FIRST.
70 Monroe, Irvine, CA 92620
Ryan ArnoldOctober 30, 2021 at 8:38 am
This is why zoning was invented — to separate incompatible land uses like residential neighborhoods and foul-smelling pollution sources like asphalt plants.
Comments are closed.