OC Power Authority CEO Brian Probolsky Has No Relevant Experience or Education Drawing Major Concerns

CEO Authorization for $75 Million Energy Transactions Draw Concerns
Starting next year, the Orange County Power Authority (OCPA) will provide electricity to every energy user in Irvine and three other OC cities that signed up for the program — Fullerton, Buena Park and Huntington Beach. The goal of such programs, called Community Choice Energy (CCE), is to provide more renewable energy, savings and choice for energy users.
But recently, environmental advocates who championed the program’s creation have raised concerns about the CEO’s lack of experience and education.
Every other leader of a California CCE of a similar size has a relevant undergraduate or masters degree and 16+ years experience in the energy industry. OCPA CEO Brian Probolsky did not attend college and has zero years experience in the energy industry.
On June 22, 2021, in a meeting with OCPA staff, consultants and advocates, Probolsky’s lack of knowledge on basic energy concepts was made evident when he asked what the acronym kWh stands for. kWh stands for kilowatt-hour, and is a standard unit of measurement for electricity.
However, on July 13, 2021, the OCPA board of directors delegated Probolsky authority for up to $75 million in energy transactions.
The decision was part of an energy risk management policy approved unanimously by the board which says that delegation of authority should be “commensurate with… capability as well as relevant training”.
OCPA board members did not discuss Probolsky’s qualifications during their discussion of the policy. UC Irvine professor Kathleen Treseder, raised the issue during public comments at the meeting, but was interrupted by OCPA attorney Ryan Baron, who said that her comments were not relevant to the discussion.
The $75 million transactional authority granted to Probolsky is unusually large among such programs. San Diego Community Power delegates up to $50 million to its CEO in transactional authority, even though the SDCP will have more than twice as many customers. Los Angeles’ Clean Power Alliance is more than three times the size of OCPA, and its executive director has $80 million in transactional authority — $5 million more than OCPA’s.
The risk management policy also says that employees are prohibited from working for another utility while employed by OCPA. Probolsky is currently president of the Moulton Niguel Water District.
An extensive public recruiting process for CEO is considered a critically important step and is typical for such programs. Probolsky was appointed by the OCPA board of directors during a closed board discussion in January without an open recruiting process or a public discussion of his qualifications.
Probolsky’s lack of experience and a lack of transparency by OCPA, as reported in the Voice of OC, were factors in a 5-0 decision last week by the city of Laguna Beach to explore joining other such programs in the region. These programs are referred to as Community Choice Energy (CCE) or Community Choice Aggregation (CCA).
The OCPA board of directors includes Irvine Mayor Farrah Khan, Irvine Councilmember Mike Carroll, Fullerton Councilmember Fred Jung, Huntington Beach Councilmember Mike Posey, and Buena Park Councilmember Susan Sonne.
The next OCPA board meeting is scheduled for August 10, 2021 at 10am. See the agenda at www.ocpower.org for details on how to participate.
*Correction: Brian Probolsky attended Orange Coast College from 1988-1990 and is currently taking classes at Brandman University. He does not hold a college degree.
11 Comments
Woofy
August 6, 2021 at 12:42 pmBesides embarrassment, how has his lack of qualification hurt OCPA and Irvine?
Dee Fox
August 6, 2021 at 2:01 pmGee Woofy…What a really dumb question. I guess you think it’s okay to give a guy with no experience and who was caught falsifying his timesheets access to spend millions of our money. Do you also think it’s okay for Mike Carroll to be at the helm of this program considering he abused taxpayer dollars and Farrah Khan covered it up for him? Is this actually Mike Carroll responding? Please state your name if you want to be taken seriously. We see enough coverup and lack of transparency, if you are not ashamed by your comment, then why hide behind a fake name?
Woofy
August 6, 2021 at 6:00 pmI assume, in addition to being a dumb question, it’s also an easy question to answer. Can you answer it?
Dee Fox
August 7, 2021 at 7:15 pmWell Woofy, these masterminds can’t defend their program. When asked how they expect to deliver 100% renewable to people that are automatically enrolled in their program and not to the people that opt out they had no answer. In fact when they were questioned about the fact that their is only one grid, how can they lie and report that their customers are getting the green energy and their neighbor is not? SCE does the distribution and confirms that everyone receives the same mix of energy. So if you want to pay these corrupt politicians more money to help finance their energy scam, by all means, pay more. A quote from Green Power Alliance who actually responded to my question… “There is no actual way to direct renewable energy to your residence, the electrical grid is all connected, and there aren’t different electrical lines for renewable energy. Your house is just using the electricity that is on the grid when you use electricity.” So Woofy….MIKE CARROLL and FARRAH KHAN are lying to the taxpayers, using our funds to finance their corrupt program, and for what? They are not producing renewables, they are purchasing fossil fuel and reporting it as clean. Apparently this is legal because they have no law or oversight to say otherwise. So fossil fuel gets purchased because it’s cheaper and that’s what gets added to the grid. If you can verify otherwise please do tell because nobody else is able to.
https://www.technocracy.news/energy-alert-community-choice-aggregator-latest-energy-scam/
Dee Fox
August 7, 2021 at 7:20 pmCorrection, about the fact that THEIR is only … should be, about the fact that THERE is only…
Woofy
August 8, 2021 at 2:11 pmThanks Dee. Your arguments seem to be against CCEs in general. How do other CCEs guarantee 100% renewable since there is one grid? I’m guessing they make sure they acquire enough renewable for all OCPA customers. Technically, there is no difference once on the grid but you can guarantee enough renewable generated to exceed OCPA consumption.
Or, are you concerned they couldn’t answer? Which I would classify as an embarrassment vs real issue.
Branda Lin
August 13, 2021 at 11:05 am“Probolsky is not required to file disclosures under the agency’s own conflict of interest code, and is the only employee not listed.”
https://voiceofoc.org/2021/08/oc-power-authority-to-rewrite-conflict-of-interest-code-without-fixing-transparency-concerns/
Dee Fox
August 13, 2021 at 3:04 pmWoofy…So, you are saying every OCPA customer will receive 100% renewable? But, me, as a person that will “opt out”, will not receive 100% renewable, even though there is ONE GRID? I am confused what you are saying because it seems like a contradiction. Bottomline, it’s not only a concern that Mike Carroll can’t address the question but a confirmation that he is lying. Who can verify that he will purchase clean energy and not fossil fuel?
Here is a what Jim Phelps, a life-long Marin resident has to say about Community Choice Energy programs. He is fluent in electricity pricing and rate structures, and owns one of the largest residential photovoltaic systems in Marin County…
Most of MCE’s Deep Green energy is based on a paper trading scheme, known as a Renewable Energy Certificate (REC). Each REC is produced by a renewable energy resource, such as a windfarm in Washington or an industrial scale solar farm somewhere in the US.
One REC represents one megawatt- hour (MWh) of energy from the windfarm. In the case of MCE, Washington keeps the wind energy and MCE buys its inexpensive RECs, giving MCE the right to tell everyone it is the one that’s green — not the wind farm.
But since MCE still needs to deliver actual electricity to its Marin customers, it purchases cheap gas-fired power, then reports that REC to governing agencies. Voila — “clean” gas-fired energy! And it’s all perfectly legal.
Legal, yes. But not particularly ethical or responsible to MCE customers, some of whom, thanks to MCE’s misleading marketing tactics, still believe they get “green electricity” through their light sockets.
Worse still, by using RECs, something bad and BIG has indeed changed – – greenhouse gas emissions are not decreasing, as the agency claims, but actually increasing because MCE is adding to the demand for gas-fired power plants. The more RECs it buys, the more demand it creates for gas- fired power — and the more emissions it produces.
The inherent fallacy of RECs is that they don’t clean anything. And at $2.50 each, they do not stimulate the construction of more renewables, as MCE claims. The real winners in the REC scheme are the regions around that Washington windfarm or out-of-county (or even out- of-state) industrial solar farm.
Those regions are the ones who get the truly clean energy — from their “steel-in-ground,” locally generated renewable resource. And those regions aren’t emitting greenhouse gases (GHGs) either, — as with MCE’s version of “clean power.” They also benefit from Marin’s money from the REC purchases.
So much for the “local benefits” of Deep Green.”
Dee Fox
August 13, 2021 at 3:05 pmCorrection – quotes begin with “Most of
Woofy
August 22, 2021 at 7:27 amThanks Dee. This confirms how I thought CCEs would justify “clean” energy. It seems your concerns are more with how CCEs are allowed to operate than OCPA specifically. And, I think that concern is valid. Why distract from it?
Dee Fox
August 23, 2021 at 12:48 pmYou are right Woofy! Thanks for making me aware of this! In the future, I will stay on track.
Comments are closed.