Opinion: Christina Shea’s Homophobic Past Called Into Question

This November, the Irvine mayoral seat is up for election, with incumbent Mayor Christina Shea running for the position. While Shea is the incumbent, she was not elected, and assumed the seat when the previous mayor resigned.
Shea is now running for “reelection.” Before you mark your ballot this November, I think it is worthwhile to take a look into Christina Shea’s past.
Last year, I began researching the LGBT rights movement in Orange County during the 1980s. While in the process of conducting this research, I found out that Christina Shea, Mayor of Irvine, was heavily involved in a homophobic organization during 1989, and that her involvement in this organization got her name on the political map in Irvine – leading to her become elected as a city councilor for the first time in 1992.
In 1988, the Irvine City Council unanimously approved its Human Rights Ordinance, which was meant to prevent discrimination “based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, physical handicap or sexual orientation.”1 In 1989, relying on help from Louis Sheldon, founder of the homophobic Traditional Values Coalition, Christina Shea, Michael Shea, and Scott Peotter founded the Irvine Values Coalition.2 The Irvine Values Coalition then gathered enough signatures to place a measure on the 1989 ballot, Measure N, which removed “sexual orientation” as a protected category under the Human Rights Ordinance, leaving the rest of the language of the Ordinance intact.
While involved in this campaign:
- The Sheas gave over $5,000 ($10,480.56 today)3 to the Irvine Values Coalition.4
- Shea wrote several op-eds in the Los Angeles Times voicing her opinion on Measure N. In one, Shea claimed that the Human Rights Ordinance granted “special protection” to homosexuals – but not to any of the other protected groups included within it.5
- During the week of the 1989 election, Shea was paraphrased in the Orange County Register: “By acknowledging homosexuals as a minority in law, [Shea] said, the government is condoning a behavior that runs contrary to accepted moral beliefs that have run this country since its inception.”6
- The Sheas stated that they had a gay person in the family and “love[d] him very much.” But, Michael told the Los Angeles Times: “We don’t happen to agree with that lifestyle.”7
- Michael Shea told the Times after Measure N’s victory that “in my opinion and Christina’s opinion, [homosexuals] are neither unchangeable nor morally neutral…If you give minority status to behavior-based life styles, you open up a Pandora’s box – to smokers, drinkers, neo-Nazis if you will.”8
Measure N succeeded 52.5% to 47.5%,9 and the city of Irvine was forced to remove its sexual orientation protections. Today, these protections are codified under California law. But at the time, they were extremely progressive; Irvine was one of the first cities in the country to adopt a law protecting sexual orientation. The damage that the Sheas, Peotter, and the Irvine Values Coalition did to the Irvine Human Rights Ordinance was only undone this July, when the Irvine City Council voted to repeal Measure N.10
Some might think that calling attention to this history is not helpful, that these events happened too long ago. But this occurred within living memory. Many Irvine residents probably remember Measure N and the Irvine Values Coalition. I’m sure that Christina Shea does. I think she remembered when she was the only person on the Irvine City Council to vote against flying the Pride Flag in June, using the exact same language she used in 1989: that it would be a special privilege, and that allowing the Pride Flag to be flown would set a dangerous precedent for all other flags. 11
Will you remember these facts when you vote on November 3rd?
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of Irvine Watchdog or any of its volunteers. If you would like to submit an Opinion article, please review our guidelines and send it to us here.
Footnotes
- Susan Peterson, “Irvine Gay-Rights Vote May Have Broader Effect,” Orange County Register, October 30, 1989.
- Eric Lichtblau, “Emotions Rule Irvine Battle on Gay Rights,” Los Angeles Times, October 9, 1989; Lily Eng and Victor F. Zonana, “O.C. Preacher Pledges New Anti-Gay Drives,” Los Angeles Times, November 9, 1989.
- U.S. Inflation Calculator, “Inflation Calculator,” CoinNews Media Group, accessed September 16, 2020, https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
- Lynn Smith, “Family: Christina and Michael Shea Say Traditional Values, Not Prejudice, Motivated Their Leadership of Measure N,” Los Angeles Times, November 12, 1989.
- Ibid.
- Susan Peterson, “Irvine Gay-Rights Vote May Have Broader Effect,” Orange County Register, October 30, 1989.
- Michael Shea qtd. by Lynn Smith, “Family: Christina and Michael Shea Say Traditional Values, Not Prejudice, Motivated Their Leadership of Measure N,” Los Angeles Times, November 12, 1989.
- Ibid.
- Irvine City Clerk’s Office, “Municipal Election History, 1971 to Present,” August 16, 2019, https://legacy.cityofirvine.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=17609.
- Joel Smith, “Irvine City Council Repeals Anti-LGBTQ Ordinance Previously Championed by Mayor Shea,” Irvine Community News & Views, July 13, 2020.
- Ben Brazil, “Irvine Approves Flying the Pride Flag, Mayor Christina Shea Only Dissenting Vote,” Daily Pilot, June 24, 2020
4 Comments
Scott Hansen
October 9, 2020 at 12:36 amGlad to see a new Watchdog writer! Welcome. Having written a Voice of OC article about the Human Rights Ordinance of 1989, I feel it’s important to complete the story. It’s true that 30 years ago, Mayor Shea fought (with others) to ban protections for the LGBTQ community in Irvine. But it’s also true that in 2020, she voted with the other Councilmembers to remove the ban from the City Code. One other point it’s become popular to call Shea an unelected, appointed mayor. Which is accurate but perhaps incomplete. Irvine voters elected her mayor in 1996, then re-elected her in 1998.
Haleigh Marcello
October 9, 2020 at 11:37 amScott – thanks for your reply! I just looked up your article in Voice of OC, and am glad to see that others are writing on this issue.
It’s true that Shea voted to repeal Measure N, but I feel she didn’t have much of a choice. She would’ve been the only dissenting vote, and it definitely would have been thrown back in her face, given her history with the measure. The fact that she voted against flying the Pride flag in June, I feel, shows her true colors.
It’s also true that Shea was mayor twenty years ago. But the voters today are not the same people as who were voting in the 90’s, especially given the fact that Irvine has a large population of college students cycling in and out of the city. I learned that Shea was not elected only ~9 months ago because I wasn’t living in Irvine yet when she took over the seat. I feel that this information isn’t as widely known to young voters, especially those who are new to the city or who don’t follow local politics, and thought it was important to include.
ParisM
October 9, 2020 at 4:52 amIf you think this is bad, I read recently that the US Supreme Court could reverse same sex marriages. Judge Clarence Thomas is leading the way.
Haleigh Marcello
October 9, 2020 at 11:40 amThis is all the more reason why state and local elections are important. If federal protections for gay marriage/LGBT rights are removed, everything will be left up to states, counties, and cities.
Comments are closed.