2016 Interview of Former Mayor Beth Krom Discusses Developer Influence in Irvine Elections and the Great Park
Krom discussed a wide-range of topics including developer influence in our elections, the development of the Great Park, and ends the interview discussing her celebrity father and family tragedy.
The entire interview is worth a listen. The “controversial” discussion of the Great Park begins at the 7:25 minute mark.
Here are some excerpts:
“What we have now are people, institutions, developers who are willing to spend a million dollars to get a council that is controlled by them and will do their bidding. I don’t think that’s in the best interest of the community.”
“People prefer to talk about personalities and not the actual issues of how the community is functioning, what we were able to achieve, and where we are today as compared to in those days.”
“I believe in planning… Now the park is essentially being planned by developers who have different interests than the interests we had for the kind of park we wanted.”
“I accept that things change. Unfortunately what I’ve learned from this whole process is, you can fight the adverse impacts of a park only to get the adverse impacts of development and the adverse impacts of the commercialization of the very park that you had hoped would be more in keeping with Balboa Park, Golden Gate Park or Central Park in New York. But we are where we are and I’m hopeful that the people both in political leadership in the city and also those within in the development community, who have a tremendous amount of influence on what that park will be, will think beyond simply commercializing the park.”
“My feeling is, the 13,470 acres that were dedicated for the Orange County Great Park is a public trust. It should be under public stewardship. By the way I also think that it’s the Orange County Great Park. Yes it’s in my city, the city of Irvine, but I’m offended that the whole narrative has now shifted to somehow, this is Irvine’s park and not all the people of OC.”
Listening to this 2016 interview and then fast-forwarding to present day, what are your thoughts?